Skip to content

Industry, Regulatory & technical publishing

Publishing without the XML specialists

Regulators, standards bodies and technical publishers all hit the same wall: the content is highly structured, the output has to be exact, and the people who write it are lawyers and engineers rather than XML operators. We build the platforms that close that gap.

Talk to us about your content

What structured publishing requires

Authoring for subject-matter experts

A browser-based editor your legal and policy teams can actually use, producing correctly structured content underneath without asking the author to understand the structure. That is exactly what the Australian Energy Market Commission’s workflow does.

One source, every format

Automatic PDF, DOCX and HTML output from a single source, so a determination or standard is published across formats without anyone reformatting it three times, and without the three versions drifting apart. This is what our legislative and regulatory publishing platform does in production.

Versioning and audit trail

Regulatory content has to prove what it said and when. Versioned documents, tracked amendments and a defensible history of change, which matters as much for internal review as for the public record.

Built for legislative bodies

A custom extension we built for Quark Publishing Platform NextGen, specifically for legislative agencies and legislative bodies: Git-style branching for document management, so parallel drafts and amendments branch, then merge back with automatic conflict detection. As a Quark partner for Australia and the USA, we license, implement and support QPP, and the extension with it.

Secure, controlled distribution

Where documents cannot simply be public: watermarked, per-organisation distribution with access controlled by entitlement, the model behind the aircraft technical publications portal we built for SES.

The proof

Work we have shipped, not a capability deck.

Common questions

How do you handle versioning and audit trails?

As a first-class requirement rather than a feature bolted on. Documents carry revisions, states and a full record of who changed what and when. In regulated publishing, being able to prove which version was current on a given date matters as much as the document itself.

Can you control who sees which documents?

Yes, and enforced at the data layer rather than in the interface. For SES we build entitlement so a query can only ever return documents that operator is entitled to see, the safest place for that rule is as far from the UI as possible.

Can it integrate with our existing publishing workflow?

Yes. Structured authoring, controlled review and approval steps, and delivery to the channels your audience already uses. We have built exactly this for aviation technical publications and for regulatory bodies, where the workflow is the product, see technical publications and structured content.

Trusted by

ACS
Coba
Doltone House
Hay St Market
SES
Lagardere
Merivale
Standards Australia
The Boat House
WSU
Venues NSW
Riptide
Australian Mutuals Archives
Niban
Bronson Safety
QTM
Skin Check Champions
Auckland Museum
ChronosHub
Social Remedy
Aust Wide Tax & Payroll
PCTE
Complibuild
Doltone Hospitality Group
Southport Sharks
Chainbuilt
Life Ready Studio
Office of the Chief Parliamentary Counsel

Start a conversation

Start a conversation

Tell us what you want to build, fix or scale, we’ll come back with a clear way forward.